{"id":538,"date":"2013-09-12T14:12:28","date_gmt":"2013-09-12T03:12:28","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.reformationministries.com.au\/blog\/?p=538"},"modified":"2013-09-12T14:12:28","modified_gmt":"2013-09-12T03:12:28","slug":"losing-my-religion-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.reformationministries.com.au\/blog\/2013\/09\/losing-my-religion-2\/","title":{"rendered":"Losing my Religion 2"},"content":{"rendered":"

Yesterday, we looked at the whole concept of Losing my Religion<\/em><\/span>. We noted that it was in fact an impossibility to lose one\u2019s religion. One may change their fundamental outlook on life, but one cannot ever be devoid of such an outlook.<\/p>\n

If it is possible to lose religion, we are of necessity faced with some \u201chairy\u201d questions. I mean to say, where did you leave your religion so that it now has a \u201clost\u201d status? Is it behind the dryer with that missing sock? Did you leave it in your other pants? Is it lost in the deep recesses of your makeup case \u2013 behind that fluorescent lipstick that you \u201cjust had to have\u201d? Maybe it is at the grocery store with your car keys?<\/p>\n

Then we have to look at the other possibilities. If someone finds your religion, do you want it returned? Did your mother sow name labels into your religion at the same time she was doing your underwear for just such an occasion? Have you gone to the police station to file a report in regard to your lost religion?<\/p>\n

Now, to the truly perplexing. If you do not want your religion back, then it is not lost, it has been abandoned<\/em><\/span>. That which is discarded is not lost, nor will it be sought. A conscious decision has been made to exchange one set of beliefs for another.<\/p>\n

So, in the end, we reassert the fact that everyone is religious and all have a religion; whether or not you subscribe to God, gods, or you elevate Man to the position of \u201cGod\u201d.<\/p>\n

This morning\u2019s news brings another story to our attention \u2013 another story that promotes the myth of neutrality<\/em> and the diarrheic drivel that people can be areligious:<\/p>\n

\u201cFormer ABBA star Bjorn Ulvaeus says people have become to [too] scared to criticise Islam and that “less religion in the world would be better.”<\/span><\/p>\n

“Look at all the misery in the Middle East for example. All these countries have Islam in common, and far too few dare to criticize Islam as an ideology, and what it’s doing to these countries,” the 68-year-old told The Wall Street Journal<\/em><\/span><\/a>.<\/span><\/p>\n

“I know I might get punched in the face for saying these things, but my conviction is that less religion in the world would be better.”<\/span><\/p>\n

Ulvaeus said he did not mean to single out any specific religion but rather believes that countries, like his native Sweden, should be “open, liberal, secular and democratic.”<\/span><\/p>\n

“Religion is the root of so much misery in the world and I’ve always thought there is lack of criticism against it,” he said.<\/span><\/p>\n

He is a member of Humanisterna (Swedish Humanist Association) which campaigns for an end to religious oppression and an open secular society.<\/span>\u201d[1]<\/a><\/p>\n

I now wish to issue a full and unqualified retraction of all that I have said. Benny has proven me wrong. As Benny was instrumental in the success of ABBA, he must, of course, be absolutely right! NOT!!!<\/span><\/p>\n

Once more, we a treated to the inane arguments of the humanist \u2013 \u201cAll evil in the world is because of religion!\u201d This hackneyed argument is trotted out time and again, especially when criticising Christianity.<\/p>\n

The astute among you will now call me a hypocrite. After what I have written, how do I deny or criticise the statement that \u201call evil in the world is because of religion\u201d. Well, I do so for a number of reasons.<\/p>\n

    \n
  1. As a Christian, evil is a consequence of sin. Sin is rebellion against God.<\/li>\n
  2. My objection is not with the statement, but with the Humanist\u2019s definition and implication.<\/li>\n
  3. What of the \u201cgood\u201d that religions, particularly Christians, do every day?<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    What I mean by this is very simple. In this statement, Benny uses the term religion\u201d in the sense outlined in the first article. He uses religion in the sense of an organised worldview that looks to God or gods. However, as we have seen, this is a faulty view of religion.<\/p>\n

    Christianity, Islam, and Judaism are monotheistic and would fall under Benny\u2019s condemnation. What then of the many Eastern religions? Some have a pantheon. Some state that \u201cgod\u201d is found within. Then we must consider those animistic religions. They are less formalised, but they still acknowledge a god or gods. Further, we have pantheism.<\/p>\n

    Who exactly is Benny criticising here?<\/p>\n

    As always, the Humanists take aim at the first three, for they are the codified \u201creligions\u201d that have a view of a Supreme God, who having revealed Himself, demands that His creatures obey Him. This, of course, does not sit very well with the Humanists who wish to follow the rebellious desires of their fallen nature.<\/p>\n

    Benny, openly criticises Islam, but his veiled comment about \u2018criticising all religions\u2019 includes Christianity. I am fairly confident that Benny is not about to enter into a diatribe against Buddhists and Animists. He attacks those codified religions. So let\u2019s understand this point well. Benny criticises those religions that have structure and a rule book.<\/span><\/p>\n

    What then is Benny\u2019s Humanism?<\/span> As you can see, he belongs to an organisation, a body with rules; a structure. (Hmmm!) Dig a little further and you will find that it also has a rule book that defines its beliefs. (Quizzical look of baffled amazement!) Read the rule book and it calls itself a religion! (Gollum: Hospitals pleases. Silly Bennises has nasty bullet holes in his footses!)<\/p>\n

    So says the Humanist Manifesto 1933:<\/p>\n

    The time has come for widespread recognition of the radical changes in religious beliefs<\/span><\/em> throughout the modern world. The time is past for mere revision of traditional attitudes. Science and economic change have disrupted the old beliefs. Religions the world over are under the necessity of coming to terms with new conditions created by a vastly increased knowledge and experience. In every field of human activity, the vital movement is now in the direction of a candid and explicit humanism<\/em><\/span>. In order that religious humanism<\/strong> <\/span>may be better understood we, the undersigned, desire to make certain affirmations which we believe the facts of our contemporary life demonstrate. There is great danger of a final, and we believe fatal, identification of the word religion with doctrines and methods which have lost their significance and which are powerless to solve the problem of human living in the Twentieth Century. Religions have always been means for realizing the highest values of life.<\/em> Their end has been accomplished through the interpretation of the total environing situation (theology or world view), the sense of values resulting therefrom (goal or ideal), and the technique (cult), established for realizing the satisfactory life<\/strong><\/span>. A change in any of these factors results in alteration of the outward forms of religion. This fact explains the changefulness of religions through the centuries. But through all changes religion itself remains constant in its quest for abiding values, an inseparable feature of human life<\/span>.<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

    Today man’s larger understanding of the universe, his scientific achievements, and deeper appreciation of brotherhood, have created a situation which requires a new statement of the means and purposes of religion<\/em>. Such a vital, fearless, and frank religion capable of furnishing adequate social goals and personal satisfactions may appear to many people as a complete break with the past<\/em><\/span>. While this age does owe a vast debt to the traditional religions, it is none the less obvious that any religion that can hope to be a synthesizing and dynamic force for today must be shaped for the needs of this age. To establish such a religion is a major necessity of the present<\/strong><\/span>.<\/span> It is a responsibility which rests upon this generation.<\/span>[2]<\/a><\/p>\n

    There it is folks. At the very outset Humanism declared itself to be the new religion<\/strong>. Please also note that it was to be a true religion! It had dogma or doctrine. It spoke of salvation. It sought to dominate the world.<\/p>\n

    Benny is right when he speaks of religions (worldviews) being at the root of many world clashes. However, he is absolutely wrong in his application. Many of these so\u2013called \u2018evils\u2019 arise when good men stand up to tyrants.<\/p>\n

    Benny is also incorrect in his assertion that Humanism is not a religion and is therefore exempt from the criticism. What of Hitler, Idi Amin, Stalin, Lenin, Pol Pot, and the myriad other tyrants of recent times who have murdered, pillaged , and plundered in the name of their particular cause?<\/p>\n

    Similarly, Benny is mistaken in the substance of his comment which passively asserts that religion, Christianity in particular, does not do any good in this world. What would the world be like if the Christians were taken away? Maybe Benny should read the book or watch the video, \u2018What if Jesus had never been born?\u2019<\/p>\n

    The prophet says that the \u201cheart of man is desperately sick<\/span>.\u201d[3]<\/a> It is evil to the core and from it flow all evils.[4]<\/a> The only panacea is Jesus Christ the Son of God. Only Jesus can bring peace and wellness to the human heart. Only Jesus can deal with the human condition \u2013 sin. Only Jesus reveals that it is His redemptive peace that will see the nations beat their swords into ploughshares.<\/p>\n

    Once more we see, not an areligious soul, but a religious soul peddling a false religion. Benny has aligned himself with those who wage war against God and against His Christ.<\/p>\n

    Benny, \u201cKiss the Son, lest He become angry and you perish in the way!\u201d<\/p>\n


    <\/p>\n
    \n
    \n

    [1]<\/a> http:\/\/www.news.com.au\/entertainment\/celebrity\/too-few-criticise-islam-abba-star-bjorn-ulvaeus-says\/story-e6frfmqi-1226717306347?utm_source=News&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=editorial&net_sub_uid=6214180<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

    \n

    [2]<\/a> Available at: http:\/\/emp.byui.edu\/marrottr\/Humanist%20Manifestos.pdf<\/a>. Accessed 12\/09\/13. Emphasis added. It may be for these reasons that there have been two more versions of the Humanist Manifesto,<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

    \n

    [3]<\/a> Jeremiah 17:9.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

    \n

    [4]<\/a> Matthew 12:34-37; Matthew 15:19-20.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

    Yesterday, we looked at the whole concept of Losing my Religion. We noted that it was in fact an impossibility to lose one\u2019s religion. One may change their fundamental outlook on life, but one cannot ever be devoid of such … Continue reading →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[4,15,8,17],"tags":[45],"class_list":["post-538","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-apologetics","category-christian-warfare","category-philosophy","category-society","tag-apologetics-worldview-religion-benny"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p2V1tu-8G","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.reformationministries.com.au\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/538","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.reformationministries.com.au\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.reformationministries.com.au\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.reformationministries.com.au\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.reformationministries.com.au\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=538"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.reformationministries.com.au\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/538\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":539,"href":"https:\/\/www.reformationministries.com.au\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/538\/revisions\/539"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.reformationministries.com.au\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=538"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.reformationministries.com.au\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=538"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.reformationministries.com.au\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=538"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}