What then has been the point of this survey and the points made? Our purpose\u00a0is to equip Christians, and any who will listen, for the current fight.<\/p>\n
Over many years now, I have watched people capitulate because of the Secularist\u2019s penchant for warring with meaningless words and using stigmatised labels. The Secularist\u2019s rarely present a cogent argument. They bully and shame with their invented and stigmatised language<\/em><\/span>.<\/p>\n Regretfully, Christians have capitulated to this language because they have not stayed true to their own Biblical worldview. Christians have thought the World\u2019s thoughts and not God\u2019s<\/em><\/span>. They have reasoned with the World\u2019s philosophy and wisdom and not with God\u2019s<\/span><\/em>.<\/p>\n Consequently, when the Secularist\u2019s \u201cname it and blame it\u201d the Christians cave. They do not want to be unloving. They do not want to be homophobic. They do not want to stigmatise. They most certainly do not want to be bigots.<\/p>\n Yet, herein is the problem<\/span>. We worship a holy God Who is a bigot<\/strong><\/span>. God says, \u2018This is right and that is wrong!\u2019 Not only does God make these pronouncements, He institutes Laws that back them up and give them force. God\u2019s way is heterosexual marriage. Therefore, adulterers and homosexuals are condemned. God loves truth. Therefore, the false witness is condemned<\/em><\/span>.<\/p>\n God\u2019s salvation is Jesus Christ and Him crucified! No alternates, no compromises, no points for human inventiveness. God loves some things.[1]<\/a> God hates other things.[2]<\/a> God says He will accept this and that He will reject that.<\/p>\n The relevance for us, as Christians, is that we were created in the image of God and then recreated in that image through Jesus Christ. Thus, we come full circle in our worldview and arrive back at the requirement that we must, as analogues of God, think His thoughts after Him<\/em><\/span>.<\/p>\n When we refuse to do this, we are compromised and we begin to give ground. We are afraid of making some forthright statements because we do not want to appear unacceptable to the Secularist and his concepts when, in fact, we should be terrified to the core of betraying God and His revealed standard<\/strong><\/span>.<\/p>\n We have arrived at this point because of an absolute reduction in Christianity. Through various influences, modern Christianity has given up on Culture. It is only interested in saving the individual soul and getting it to heaven. Thus, politics, social constructs, cultural mores, God\u2019s Word, and a whole raft of items have been \u201cblessed\u201d into obscurity by being deemed unnecessary.[3]<\/a><\/p>\n As a result, the need to win individual souls fuels a flurry of activity, much of which is aimed at answering the foolish question, \u201cHow do we not offend the pagan<\/em>?\u201d[4]<\/a> Consequently, we are urged to drop a range of Holy Spirit inspired, Authoritative truths from Scripture.<\/p>\n Here, the Secularists have done their job well for we find the Church trying to adopt alternate words and sanitised language<\/span>. God is reinvented. He never gets angry. He accepts all without question. Commonly, God is said to love everyone equally and without fail.<\/p>\n If this is so, we must jettison the doctrine of sin. If sin is out, we must also toss overboard the doctrine of Hell. As God is so accommodating, we are obliged<\/em> to drop from our language all words of commission. We cannot use words like must<\/em>, ought<\/em>, obey<\/em>, observe<\/em>, should<\/em>, or oblige<\/em> (whoops!). The Ten Commandments <\/span>must<\/em> become the Ten Suggestions<\/span>. Christ\u2019s statement, \u201cIf you love me you will keep my commandments\u201d is reinterpreted to, \u201cI would be pleased if you loved me and tried to stay within My suggestions; but it\u2019s okay if you do not.\u201d<\/p>\n In all seriousness, I now ask, \u201cBased on these new ideas, what message do we take to the world<\/span>?\u201d If God loves everybody equally and makes no demands upon a person at the personal level, then what is the purpose of the Church or Christianity?<\/p>\n This is precisely why we fail. We are not prepared, in the current argument, to state that God hates homosexuals and thereby put the smell of fire and brimstone into people\u2019s nostrils. \u2018No, no, we cannot do that, it might offend.\u2019 will come the reply. Now for the real question \u2013 \u201cWho would we rather offend Man or God?<\/strong><\/span>\u201d Do we offend Man by trampling on his invented concepts or do we offend God by pretending that He is not the measure of all things?<\/p>\n By our adoption of the World\u2019s standard we have given ground in this battle. We are unable to argue with the Secularists because we have naught to say. We do not want to state the truth because the Secularist has his shame labels prepared and is just waiting to plaster us. So we modify our stand. We try to use moderate language. We try to argue logic and statistic rather than, \u201cThus says the Lord!\u201d<\/p>\n To illustrate this, let me give an example from a recently televised interview. At the centre of this interview on the ABC was a Christian fellow (more haranguing; I lost the links) who had been a homosexual and had been converted. Opposing him, were the other interviewees who denied the Bible with all the standard fallacies. At one point, the interviewer asked this Christian, \u201cAren’t you\u00a0being Judgemental?\u201d<\/p>\n A few comments must be made. First<\/span>, there it is, the stigmatised language<\/em>. The Christian is accused of being \u2018judgemental\u2019. I do not recall questions of a similar nature being presented to the others. Questions like, \u201cThe plain reading of the Bible seems to denounce homosexuals. Why then do you as a Christian not believe the Bible?\u201d<\/p>\n Second<\/span>, and this is more to the point, the Christian gentleman was slightly taken aback with the question. He responded by saying that \u2018they come to me, I do not go out to them.\u2019 The inference was simple. I am not out on the street peddling my wares, people come into my shop.<\/p>\n Please note that the question was not answered, it was deflected<\/em><\/span>.<\/p>\n Without wanting to seem critical, this is an example that has been witnessed over and over in this and other debates. The Christian is unsure and maybe unprepared, so they look for a diffusive answer.<\/p>\n Why back peddle when we can advance<\/strong>?<\/span> When asked about being judgemental, would not a good reply be, \u201cNo more than you are being by asking that question!<\/span>\u201d In other words, what is the position and agenda of the interviewer? As we have noted, they have a world view; they are not neutral; so hold them to account by their own standard<\/em>.<\/p>\n \u201cYou have inferred that my position is judgemental. Well, yes it is. God decries homosexuality. Therefore, I take my stand on His Word and oppose this practice on His authority. Now, let me ask, \u2018On what basis do you judge me?\u2019 Your question clearly implies that my position is unacceptable to you; please explain your hypocrisy. Why is it wrong for me to dislike their belief, but it is acceptable for you to dislike my belief?\u201d<\/p>\n Brethren, Countrymen, this is how we must begin to react to the war of meaningless words<\/span> and the stigmatising labels that make up the arsenal of the Secularist. To agree that they are correct is to explicitly deny God\u2019s word. It is to say, in essence, truth does not exist. It is to agree with the Secularist in saying, \u2018relativism is the order of the day and meaning is what we give to any particular thing.\u2019 When this is done, we have agreed that Man is god and we have aided the God-haters in the overthrow of the One True and living God.<\/p>\n Therefore, brethren, hold fast to what is good! God is good. His Word is perfect. It is a lamp to our path. It is God\u2019s wisdom that confuses the wise of this age. It is God\u2019s word alone that is our power.<\/p>\n So let us imbibe deeply of that Word (living and written) so that we may answer the fool when he speaks with a Heavenly wisdom that cannot be refuted. Let us shred the Secularist\u2019s worldview, his meaningless words, and his wretched labels with the Divinely appointed scissors found in God\u2019s word \u2013 the weapons appointed for the tearing down of strongholds!<\/p>\n Let us fight this war in God\u2019s power, with God\u2019s tactics, dressed in God\u2019s armour. Let us give up on the feeble wisdom of this World and apply the mind of Christ, in Who are all the treasures of wisdom and knowledge.<\/p>\n May I therefore encourage you to equip yourself with understanding in these matters. Arm yourself. Prepare yourself. Then, the next time you encounter meaningless words and stigmatising labels, you will be able defeat them and turn the battle for Jesus Christ.<\/p>\n For I am not ashamed of the gospel, for it is the power of God for salvation to everyone who believes, to the Jew first and also to the Greek. For in it the <\/em>righteousness of God is revealed!<\/span><\/p>\n [1]<\/a> 2 Corinthians 9:7; Psalm 37:28; Psalm 87:2;<\/p>\n<\/div>\n [2]<\/a> Proverbs 6:16-19; Deuteronomy 12:31.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n [3]<\/a> This is illustrated very clearly when some Christian Commentators feel it necessary to explain to Christians why they should be involved in politics. See:\u00a0http:\/\/www.billmuehlenberg.com\/2013\/07\/10\/god-politics-and-elections\/<\/a>.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n [4]<\/a> The question is foolish precisely because it is unBiblical. 2 Corinthians 2:15-16: For we are a fragrance of Christ to God among those who are being saved and among those who are perishing; to the one an aroma from death to death, to the other an aroma from life to life. And who is adequate for these things?<\/span> 1 Peter 2:7b-8: But for those who disbelieve, \u201cThe stone which the builders rejected, This became the very corner stone,<\/em>\u201d and, \u201cA stone of stumbling and a rock of offense\u201d; for they stumble because they are disobedient to the word, and to this doom<\/em> they were also appointed.<\/span> 1 Corinthians 1:18: For the word of the cross is to those who are perishing foolishness, but to us who are being saved it is the power of God.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" What then has been the point of this survey and the points made? Our purpose\u00a0is to equip Christians, and any who will listen, for the current fight. Over many years now, I have watched people capitulate because of the Secularist\u2019s … Continue reading
<\/p>\n
\n