{"id":106,"date":"2012-11-08T04:37:57","date_gmt":"2012-11-08T05:37:57","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.reformationministries.com.au\/blog\/?p=106"},"modified":"2013-02-04T12:37:10","modified_gmt":"2013-02-04T01:37:10","slug":"106","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.reformationministries.com.au\/blog\/2012\/11\/106\/","title":{"rendered":"The Essence of War: Part 2"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">In your minds, right now, you may be asking, \u201cWhy all this warmongering?\u201d That is an excellent question. The simple answer is, if I might quote Aragorn, \u201c<span style=\"color: #cc99ff;\">Open war is upon you whether you would have it or not!<\/span>\u201d The battle lines are drawn and there is no neutrality. Every man, woman, and child, is in an army that wars with Christ or wars against Christ. This is the big picture. This is the cosmic battle shown to us clearly on the pages of Scripture. (Genesis 3:15; Ephesians 6:11-12; Revelation 19:19; Luke 11:23)<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">This said; let us try to bring this cosmic battle to the reality of our everyday lives. We have noted that men will live out the desires of their heart. We have noted that men are motivated by only one of two absolute, heartfelt passions \u2013 <strong>love for God <\/strong>or <em>hatred of God<\/em>. This means that when you encounter a person on the street you are engaging one of these heartfelt motives.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">This means, in terms of concrete, life affirming, life altering, or \u201crubber hits the road\u201d application, that when:<\/p>\n<ul style=\"text-align: justify;\">\n<li>You interact with a politician you are engaging one of these heartfelt motives.<\/li>\n<li>You write to the editor of your local news paper you are engaging one of these heartfelt motives.<\/li>\n<li>You watch a television show you are witnessing the expression of one of these heartfelt motives.<\/li>\n<li>You vote in an election you are choosing one of these heartfelt motives.<\/li>\n<li>You educate your children you will subject them to a curriculum based in one of these heartfelt motives.<\/li>\n<li>You give forth an opinion you will be giving rise to one of these heartfelt motives; or<\/li>\n<li>You give forth an opinion that is a compromise because it is a policy that runs contrary to your heartfelt motive.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The absolute failure of the Church to grasp this most elementary principle and to inculcate it into Christians as a core belief is <em>a<\/em>, if not <strong>the<\/strong>, fundamental reason Christianity is in disarray today. Christians and Christianity are being defeated, befuddled, battered, and bewildered because they operate on a basis that denies this essential truth.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Let me illustrate this with reference to the recent Presidential election in the United States. One Christian social commentator created a stir by saying that, although he was a republican, he would not vote for Mitt Romney. He did this, not on policy, but principle. Mitt Romney was a Mormon and therefore would not receive his vote. This stance brought a degree of criticism. Now that Barack Obama has been re-elected, he has received communications blaming him and others like him for the resultant state. I find this sad. How blind we have become! Mitt Romney is an apostate Mormon. Barack Obama is an apostate Humanist. In essence, what is the difference? They both lie, cheat, and steal \u201ccandy from babies\u201d! Neither has a God-loving spirit. Neither are going to produces works of righteousness. Neither are going to lower taxes, increase employment, outlaw abortion, abolish poverty, or cut government spending. In terms of our discussion, both of these men are sided against God and His Christ. Thus, whilst there may be some policy differences, either reign will still ultimately result in a culture of death. Out of the overflow of their dead hearts, policies of death will flow forth to implementation. Reform will never be seen. As for righteousness \u2026?; no statement is needed!<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The same can be said of our own country. I remember well, during the time of Paul Keating\u2019s Prime Ministership, Christians being dismayed at certain proposals and outcomes. Why? The man was a self-professed atheist. He was a God-hater to the core. Why would you ever expect a man whose \u201cheartfelt motive\u201d was venomous vitriol against God to bring forth righteous laws that promoted true life?<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">We, in Australia, will be going to the polls soon. What is our choice? None! We have a fornicating, self-professed atheist currently holding the Prime Ministership. What will Julia Gillard ever do to promote God\u2019s righteousness as the only standard for this nation? On the other side we have Tony Abbott. What can we expect from this man? Well, he belongs to the Congregation of Rome, but that is a very different thing to being a Christian. It means that he may be influenced on some moral decisions in a direction that approximates the Biblical standard. However, we must be aware that an approximation, even a close approximation, is not the \u201creal McCoy\u201d!<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Equally, Mr Abbott is on <a title=\"Tony Abbott\" href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Tony_Abbott#cite_ref-ReferenceA_115-0\">record<\/a> as denying the essence of religion in public office. Says he: \u201cWe are all influenced by a value system that we hold, but in the end, every decision that a politician makes is, or at least should, in our society be based on the normal sorts of considerations. It&#8217;s got to be publicly justifiable; not only justifiable in accordance with a private view; a private <a title=\"Extract from Four Corners\" href=\"http:\/\/www.abc.net.au\/4corners\/content\/2010\/s2846485.htm\">belief<\/a>.\u201d<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">What Mr. Abbott here espouses is sheer nonsense. It runs contrary to the declaration of Scripture. Men will always act in accord with their ultimate motive (religion). Yes, men can be hypocritical. However, ultimately they will act in accord with and be faithful to their one true heartfelt motive. The truth of this is seen in Mr Abbott\u2019s use of the phrase, \u201cnormal sorts of considerations\u201d. What, pray tell, is this animal? Let us illustrate. Mr Abbott, as a congregant of Rome, has certain moral perspectives. He stands against euthanasia and abortion. However, as Minister for Health and Ageing, did Tony Abbott outlaw abortion? No, he did not. He was content to see numbers reduced. Herein is the problem. His moral compass may direct him toward certain positions that mimic Scriptures\u2019. However, as a Roman Humanist, he is equally governed by the \u201c<em>normal sorts of consideration<\/em>\u201d. As a politician, one of these considerations is being elected. Thus, to quote one of my favourite phrases, he will do the \u201cexpedient, not the right\u201d! God says, do not murder. This is the absolute position of the heartfelt motive that loves Jesus. Mr Abbott\u2019s version is, murder fewer. This is the position of \u201cnormal considerations\u201d and the relative position of the heartfelt motive opposed to Christ.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">In the end, we ask, \u201cWhat is the difference between Julia Gillard and Tony Abbott?\u201d The answer is, very little. The best that can be said at the moment is that a Liberal government will do better monetarily. That is it. Labour governments have never been able to balance a cheque book. (This is no criteria for election!) Outside of this there is almost no difference. Why is this? Precisely because both are governed by a \u201cheartfelt principle\u201d that is at war with Jesus Christ.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">As with America, so in Australia, there will be Christians who will bicker over candidates based on what flag they serve under, rather than based on the heartfelt motive of the individual candidate. (We do not have room to comment on Party Politics and some other associated points.) There will be Christians who are disappointed with political stands and outcomes. Christians will be confused and bewildered by the contradictions, lies, and deceit of politicians and this will continue to happen until we indoctrinate ourselves with the true Biblical picture.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">This brings us back to our definition of war; to the constancy of this war; and to the application of these principles to our day.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Australia, whilst not currently a Christian country, was founded upon Christian principles. Our culture was derived from and based upon the Law-Word of God. It is very hard not to see this fact; <span style=\"color: #cc99ff;\">indeed one would need to be <em>wilfully ignorant<\/em>, not to see the similarity between the Decalogue and the foundational values of this country<\/span>. The application of God\u2019s law restrained evil. It had the benefit of guiding our society in a better way, whether or not the members of our society were overtly Christian. The honour of God in worship, the acknowledgement of God\u2019s right to rule in civil ceremony, and the civil obedience to His covenant stipulations gave Australia a \u201cleg to stand on\u201d. It did so precisely because these elements combined brought a blessing from God that restrained evil.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Thus we rejected the murder of infants, the infirmed, and the aged, no matter what wonderful modern label was used to disguise this evil. We rejected homosexuality, bestiality, fornication, and all other sexual perversion, recognising that God made male and female and these alone he blessed with fertility in covenant relationship (marriage). We honoured the family as the chief building block of society. Thus we protected it from adultery. We supported it with tax breaks and concessions. In these practices, we were like a careful gardener who tended his plants attentively. We weeded. We fertilised. We watered, and all this in the hope and belief that our culture would flourish.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Now we find ourselves as Christians and as a culture battered, bruised, and dying. Sexual perversion is no longer a relevant term. Anything is seemingly legitimate or \u2018give it long enough\u2019 and it acceptance is assured. Marriage is threatened by whoremongers and their self-fulfilling prophecies. The family is attacked in a myriad of ways including, but not limited to, the erosion of parental authority, Statist calls for discipline to be labelled \u2018abuse\u2019, and by a \u201cUser Pays\u201d system for utilities and health care. People are confused. Uncertainty reigns. Evil is not restrained; nor are men. Why is this? It is because the ungodly are epistemologically self-conscious in this war and the Christians, seemingly, are not. By this we mean that the ungodly are very much self-aware of their hostility to Christ and the pursuit of their agenda. They are aware that they are fighting to throw off God\u2019s rule.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">In short, the ungodly hate the Godly restraints that our society has historically enshrined in law. Consequently, as our nation has deepened its connection with Secularism, the war has become more obvious. It has become an imperative that additional mores need to be overthrown. These will not rest until, in Nietzsche\u2019s words, \u201cGod is dead\u201d and every thought of Him has been eradicated.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Man, under the tutelage of Secular Humanism, has decided that they must express their hatred of God by insisting that man be given ultimate freedom to choose for himself right and wrong, good and evil, moral and immoral. Man in his unregenerate state realises that God\u2019s righteousness, the only appropriate \u201cmeasuring stick\u201d, limits man\u2019s preponderance for evil and debauchery. Thus, man has gone to war <em>to get what he wants<\/em> \u2013 autonomy to destruction. If you doubt this, please go and read the first chapter of Romans. Then read it again and again. Do not read your words into the text, but let Paul tell you of man\u2019s war against God.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Brethren, let us grasp this point so that your frustration, disappointments, and therapeutic head-banging may cease.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">We can illustrate the need to change our perspective by referencing current political happenings. Recently, by the mercies of God, our Parliament voted to retain the current definition of marriage, rather than open marriage to homosexuals and other perversions beside. We have already <a title=\"The Battle still Rages\" href=\"http:\/\/www.reformationministries.com.au\/blog\/2012\/11\/the-war-was-not-won-the-battle-still-rages\/\">written<\/a> about the need for Christians not to look upon this vote as the end of the war, but merely a skirmish in the battle. We have also noted that this decision was nothing more than a vote on the definition of marriage. It was in no way a rejection of homosexuality or heterosexual perversions. It was not an assertive statement concerning the centrality and importance of marriage as God commanded. It was nothing more than a vote on a definition. It was a vote devoid of morality, theology, and essence.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">What we would like to highlight is the tenacity with which the homosexual agenda (war) is being pursued and the way this pursuit has shown many politicians to be walking contradictions. Did you note that Julia Gillard crossed the floor in this vote? With this action, she voted to retain the current definition of marriage. Yet, as you know, she is not married, but lives with a man. It was also her alliance with independent candidates that brought our nation to this situation. Now, ask yourself this question. \u201cWhat would Julia Gillard have done if the definition of marriage was changed? The simple answer is, she would have accepted it. Her heartfelt motive is antagonistic to Jesus Christ. If as a nation we had walked further from God, she would not have been concerned.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">This also explains why, so soon after this vote, we saw the government grant homosexual couples assistance to raise families. In this, their so-called \u2018family unit\u2019, was given the same status as the God ordained and sanctioned \u201cridgy-didge\u201d family unit. There is no delineation between reality and travesty. How can this be? Well, it goes back to the statement of Mr. Abbott above. This is the relative position of the \u201cnormal consideration\u201d of the heart opposed to God. It is an expression of our nation\u2019s and our culture\u2019s war against God.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Understand this point well, please. The government is happy to allow the definition of marriage to stand because they have effectively nullified God\u2019s order in other ways. Homosexuals have obtained equal rights under law at almost every point. Equally, while the nation was looking at this issue, what other sinister nasties passed by unnoticed. Consequently, the proverbial \u2018fly on the wall\u2019 might hear a conversation such as, \u2018So, the marriage definition was retained. No big deal. We will just use our power to add in other benefits and thereby establish homosexual rights anyway. We will give them family assistance etc., etc., and so on.\u2019 This is what, in times of war, would be called a \u2018covert operation\u2019. Neither should it be forgotten that our country is led by a Prime Minister who has been caught lying on more than one occasion. What do <em>words of bond<\/em>, <em>oaths of promise<\/em>, or a simple <em>handshake<\/em> mean to such a one?<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Christians are rejoicing in the fact that the retention of the current definition of marriage was \u2018a magnificent win\u2019, yet, because they do not realise that open war is upon them, they do not see that it was but a hollow victory. Nothing substantial was gained. The homosexuals are still being courted by the government and it will only be a matter of time before we see another challenge to the legal definition of marriage. Thus, Christianity in this nation is like an army that repels a feint without realising that a large enemy force nears from another direction. Christians are duped because they do not realise or accept the vehemence, hostility, and tenacity of their enemy.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Just as the man argues for and establishes his reality according to his heartfelt principle, so do governments! Do not expect righteousness from unrighteous governments. Do not expect an unrighteous government to be fair, ethical, open, and above all, Godly. <span style=\"color: #cc99ff;\">You may as readily expect David Attenborough to enter a pulpit and extol the wonders of Jesus Christ as God\u2019s agent of Creation!<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Brethren do not be deceived nor deceive yourselves. One war; Two sides! Individually and politically!<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The war continues!<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Today, we awaken to news that the unreality show, <a title=\"Homosexual wins Big Brother\" href=\"http:\/\/www.news.com.au\/entertainment\/television\/benjamin-norris-wins-big-brother-2012\/story-e6frfmyi-1226512051649\">Big Brother<\/a>, an abomination if ever there were, has this time around been won by a homosexual who used the opportunity to propose to his partner.\u00a0The second paragraph of this article reads: \u201c<em>In a gesture that has instantly made him a flagbearer for the cause of gay marriage, Norris said he had always planned to use the show&#8217;s publicity to express his love for Williams.<\/em>\u201d Further into the article we are granted this commentary: \u201c<em>Ex-housemate Michael Beveridge said he hoped that Norris and Williams&#8217; marriage would inspire others. \u201cHopefully, now he&#8217;s in a famous gay couple, he can forge a path for other people to think about starting a family and getting what every other Australian gets.<\/em>\u201d\u201d<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">In the context of self-awareness, please note the comment, \u201c<em>he had always planned to use the show&#8217;s publicity\u2026<\/em>\u201d The whole occurrence was not an accident. It was planned. More pointedly, the whole happening was essentially and exercise in futility, but it was an exercise in futility to further their war against God. Confused? Let me break the statements up. It was an exercise in futility in that homosexual marriage is illegal. It has no basis in law and is excluded by definition \u2013 as the nation has seen of recent. As such, Mr. Norris\u2019s proposal was a <em>proposal to naught<\/em> and an exercise in futility. Thus, Mr. Norris may have just as easily invited Martians to attend his next birthday party or proposed marriage to a unicorn! This said, we must realise that this nonsense had a point \u2014 to reassert his personal hatred of God and His standard. It is also to be doubted that the producers of the show did not know that this stunt was about to be unleashed. Here again, the heartfelt motive of hatred for God comes to the fore. The homosexual wants what he wants regardless of God\u2019s Law. The producers are willing to allow this as they want the ratings and publicity that such a stunt will bring. The homosexuals and television producers gathered together against God and against His Anointed!<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The <em>world<\/em> has gone to war to get what it wants. So desperate is it that it respects nothing and will destroy any obstacle in its way. A bit of an over statement? Not at all. Think this through. It was only a few months ago that Parliament voted to retain the current definition of Marriage. Why is it then that, in this great democracy, none seem to respect the outcome of the vote? Keep in mind also that recent figures show that homosexuals comprise less than two percent of the population. Now, I admit that ethics is not about numbers. However, in this instance, ethically, the current definition of marriage is correct, yet a change is being demanded by an extreme minority. If we follow this logic and this is our version of \u201cdemocracy\u201d then, get ready for Sharia law and any number of other possibilities!<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The point here is that the war against God realises some very strange bedfellows. People who, on another issue, may be at loggerheads readily abandon their differences to war against God. Here, we see the homosexuals not willing to respect the law of the land or the democratic principle on which it is established. Yet, at another point, they will argue their case in terms of \u2018democracy\u2019. Worse, we see that the government is not willing to uphold its own process. The government votes to retain the current definition of marriage and then, almost immediately, gives homosexuals access to benefits designed for families. In so doing the government elevates the homosexual travesty to a position of equality with a real family. Seemingly, the government does not believe in \u2018democracy\u2019! (I think we all knew this. It is just interesting that the veil of pretence is beginning to crack.) What is the common denominator? They share a heartfelt motive. They together hate God and wish to throw off His rule.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">What then is the Christian\u2019s response? In this instance, it is truly a case of fighting fire with fire. The Christians of this nation must go <em>to war in order to protect what they have<\/em>, but also to take back what has been lost. Moreover, we should see this as an opportunity to extend our warfare so as <em>to obtain what we want<\/em> or, more precisely, what Jesus has commanded. In short, we must remember that Yahweh instigated this war. This means that we must not only fight for Him, but also that we fight for that which He went to war\u2014summarised in the person and work of Jesus Christ!<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">So my friends, here is the war. Here is the battle line. The Humanists have waged a war to get what they want. They are tireless and unceasing in pressing this war and pursuing their agenda. We must likewise be as aggressive in our war against their ungodliness.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">We must understand that Christ and Christianity won little but a reprieve in the recent vote. We must understand that the Church has lost a lot of ground precisely because She has been, colloquially speaking, \u201casleep at the wheel\u201d. A major part of this slumber is due to the erosion of <em>sound doctrine<\/em> which has left Christians without an identity and totally confused. We have been led to believe in a God that accepts everything and rejects nothing. We have been led to believe that Christianity has had a good run and that it would be a simple act of greed or selfishness on the part of Christianity if it desired to retain or regain its position. We are told, again in Aussie parlance, that it is time for a \u201cfair suck of the sav\u201d religiously speaking. We are told that we must be open and affirming; that true community is an amalgam; that Christianity\u2019s demand of exclusiveness is ruining the ideal of a Utopian brotherhood of man. All of this modern rubbish has infiltrated the Church, weakened her stance, and encouraged attacks from the enemy. Like a nation who has let her outer defence collapse, She is ripe for the plucking.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Brethren, the war is upon us. The propaganda machine is at work. It is part of the <em>world\u2019s<\/em> war. We can expect more stunts like that on Big Brother. The world is going to war <em>to get what it wants<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The question I direct to you, Brethren, is, \u201cDo you love Jesus enough to go to war not only <span style=\"color: #cc99ff;\"><em>to keep what you have, but to gain more for your King<\/em><\/span>?\u201d<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In your minds, right now, you may be asking, \u201cWhy all this warmongering?\u201d That is an excellent question. The simple answer is, if I might quote Aragorn, \u201cOpen war is upon you whether you would have it or not!\u201d The &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.reformationministries.com.au\/blog\/2012\/11\/106\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[4,10,7,6],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-106","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-apologetics","category-culture","category-ecclesiology","category-reform"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/s2V1tu-106","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.reformationministries.com.au\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/106","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.reformationministries.com.au\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.reformationministries.com.au\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.reformationministries.com.au\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.reformationministries.com.au\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=106"}],"version-history":[{"count":10,"href":"https:\/\/www.reformationministries.com.au\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/106\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":269,"href":"https:\/\/www.reformationministries.com.au\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/106\/revisions\/269"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.reformationministries.com.au\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=106"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.reformationministries.com.au\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=106"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.reformationministries.com.au\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=106"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}